DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda 626 vs 2000 Volkswagen Passat Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeVolkswagen
626ModelPassat
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
185 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
101 HPPower115 HP
220 NmTorque172 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank62 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption12,3 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4575 mmLength4703 mm
1710 mmWidth1746 mm
1430 mmHeight1462 mm
1275 KgWeight1340 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2703 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda 626 and 2000 Volkswagen Passat approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…