DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Audi A3 vs 2000 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi A3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

58.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi A3SpecificationMazda 626
AudiMakeMazda
A3Model626
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

Audi A3SpecificationMazda 626
12,4 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
181 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
90 HPPower101 HP
210 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi A3SpecificationMazda 626
DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank64 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption6,4 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi A3SpecificationMazda 626
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi A3SpecificationMazda 626
4152 mmLength4575 mm
1735 mmWidth1710 mm
1427 mmHeight1430 mm
1185 KgWeight1275 Kg
2513 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Audi A3 and 2000 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi A3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…