DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda 626 vs 2000 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi A3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 626SpecificationAudi A3
MazdaMakeAudi
626ModelA3
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

Mazda 626SpecificationAudi A3
11,5 s0–100 km/h12,4 s
185 km/hTop speed181 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
101 HPPower90 HP
220 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 626SpecificationAudi A3
DieselFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 626SpecificationAudi A3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 626SpecificationAudi A3
4575 mmLength4152 mm
1710 mmWidth1735 mm
1430 mmHeight1427 mm
1275 KgWeight1185 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2513 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda 626 and 2000 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi A3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…