2000 • Mazda
626
Mazda 626 2.0 H.P. (136 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
2000 Mazda 626 vs 2000 Renault Laguna Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Renault
Laguna
Renault Laguna 2.0 16V (K56D/M) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Renault Laguna
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 626SpecificationRenault Laguna
MazdaMakeRenault
626ModelLaguna
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 626SpecificationRenault Laguna
10,5 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
202 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1948 cc
136 HPPower139 HP
181 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 626SpecificationRenault Laguna
PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank66 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption12,1 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 626SpecificationRenault Laguna
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 626SpecificationRenault Laguna
4660 mmLength4620 mm
1710 mmWidth1752 mm
1515 mmHeight1448 mm
1305 KgWeight1400 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2670 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mazda 626 and 2000 Renault Laguna approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Renault Laguna leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…