DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Renault Laguna vs 2000 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Laguna

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeMazda
LagunaModel626
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
198 km/hTop speed202 km/h
1948 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
139 HPPower136 HP
185 NmTorque181 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank64 lt
12,1 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4620 mmLength4660 mm
1752 mmWidth1710 mm
1448 mmHeight1515 mm
1400 KgWeight1305 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Renault Laguna and 2000 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Laguna leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…