DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1989 Mazda 626 vs 1989 Volvo 480 E Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 480 E

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeVolvo
626Model480 E
1989Model year1989
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

11,3 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
176 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1721 cc
90 HPPower102 HP
150 NmTorque142 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption9,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,1 lt
—Average consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size185/60 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4120 mmLength4258 mm
2056 mmWidth1710 mm
1450 mmHeight1323 mm
—Weight1030 Kg
—Wheelbase2503 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1989 Mazda 626 and 1989 Volvo 480 E approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 480 E leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…