DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1989 Volvo 480 E vs 1989 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 480 E

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeMazda
480 EModel626
1989Model year1989
CoupeBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
185 km/hTop speed176 km/h
1721 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
102 HPPower90 HP
142 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption—
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4258 mmLength4120 mm
1710 mmWidth2056 mm
1323 mmHeight1450 mm
1030 KgWeight—
2503 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1989 Volvo 480 E and 1989 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 480 E leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…