DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda 626 vs 2000 Opel Vectra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeOpel
626ModelVectra
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,9 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
178 km/hTop speed178 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
90 HPPower82 HP
145 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,4 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,8 lt
—Average consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4660 mmLength4495 mm
1710 mmWidth1707 mm
1515 mmHeight1425 mm
1280 KgWeight1335 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2637 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda 626 and 2000 Opel Vectra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…