DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Skoda Fabia vs 2000 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeMazda
FabiaModel626
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h12,6 s
185 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1840 cc
98 HPPower100 HP
240 NmTorque152 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank64 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
5,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size185/65 R15 88H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3960 mmLength4575 mm
1645 mmWidth1710 mm
1450 mmHeight1430 mm
1155 KgWeight1180 Kg
2462 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Skoda Fabia and 2000 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…