1995 • Mazda
626
Mazda 626 1.8 i (105 Hp) 1995Overall Score53.25/100
1995 Mazda 626 vs 1995 Fiat Croma Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • Fiat
Croma
Fiat Croma 1995Overall Score52.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 626
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
53.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 626SpecificationFiat Croma
MazdaMakeFiat
626ModelCroma
1995Model year1995
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Mazda 626SpecificationFiat Croma
10,1 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
190 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1929 cc
105 HPPower94 HP
155 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 626SpecificationFiat Croma
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption6 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 626SpecificationFiat Croma
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14 88 HTyre size175/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 626SpecificationFiat Croma
4695 mmLength4520 mm
1750 mmWidth1760 mm
1400 mmHeight1430 mm
1150 KgWeight1240 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2660 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1995 Mazda 626 and 1995 Fiat Croma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…