DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Volkswagen Polo vs 1995 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeMazda
PoloModel626
1995Model year1995
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h10,1 s
176 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1840 cc
90 HPPower105 HP
202 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
—Average consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size185/70 R14 88 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4137 mmLength4695 mm
1640 mmWidth1750 mm
1433 mmHeight1400 mm
1170 KgWeight1150 Kg
2444 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Volkswagen Polo and 1995 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…