DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Mazda 626 vs 1992 Geo Storm Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 626SpecificationGeo Storm
MazdaMakeGeo
626ModelStorm
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

Mazda 626SpecificationGeo Storm
10,1 s0–100 km/h12,4 s
190 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1588 cc
105 HPPower130 HP
155 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 626SpecificationGeo Storm
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank47 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption13 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 626SpecificationGeo Storm
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14 88 HTyre size205/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 626SpecificationGeo Storm
4695 mmLength4150 mm
1750 mmWidth1695 mm
1400 mmHeight1300 mm
1150 KgWeight1010 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2450 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Mazda 626 and 1992 Geo Storm approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…