DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Audi 80 vs 1995 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationMazda 626
AudiMakeMazda
80Model626
1995Model year1995
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationMazda 626
14,1 s0–100 km/h—
172 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1840 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
148 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationMazda 626
PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank0 lt
10,8 ltUrban consumption—
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationMazda 626
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationMazda 626
4482 mmLength—
1695 mmWidth—
1408 mmHeight—
1230 KgWeight—
2612 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Audi 80 and 1995 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…