DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Renault Scenic vs 2016 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

72.75–72.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeMazda
ScenicModel6
2016Model year2016
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,1 s0–100 km/h10,1 s
205 km/hTop speed209 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
165 HPPower165 HP
380 NmTorque210 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank62 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—TransmissionAT
225/50 R17Tyre size17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4366 mmLength4870 mm
1845 mmWidth1840 mm
—Height1450 mm
1614 KgWeight1340 kg
—Luggage capacity480 lt

Additional Features

Mazda 6Driver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRElectronic Parking BrakeComing HomeLeaving HomeTrip ComputerKeyless Startstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsFront Parking SensorsRear Parking SensorsReversing CameraAuto-dimming Rear-view MirrorRain SensorLight SensorFolding MirrorsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Renault Scenic and 2016 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…