2016 • Mazda
6
Mazda 6 Power 2016 2.0 165 HPOverall Score72.5/100
2016 Mazda 6 vs 2016 Renault Samsung QM6 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Renault Samsung
QM6
Renault Samsung QM6 2.0 dCi (177 Hp) 2016Overall Score72.75/100
WINNER
Renault Samsung QM6
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
72.5–72.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 6SpecificationRenault Samsung QM6
MazdaMakeRenault Samsung
6ModelQM6
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 6SpecificationRenault Samsung QM6
10,1 s0–100 km/h—
209 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
165 HPPower177 HP
210 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 6SpecificationRenault Samsung QM6
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank0 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption8,8 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption7,9 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption8,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 6SpecificationRenault Samsung QM6
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6GearsCVT
ATTransmission—
17Tyre size225/60 R18 100H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 6SpecificationRenault Samsung QM6
4870 mmLength4675 mm
1840 mmWidth1845 mm
1450 mmHeight1710 mm
1340 kgWeight1735 Kg
480 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2705 mm
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Mazda 6 and 2016 Renault Samsung QM6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Renault Samsung QM6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…