DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Mazda 6 vs 2015 Subaru Forester Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

68.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeSubaru
6ModelForester
2013Model year2015
EstateBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,4 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
218 km/hTop speed196 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2498 cc
170 HPPower175 HP
226 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears—
—Tyre size225/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4765 mmLength4595 mm
1795 mmWidth1795 mm
1490 mmHeight1735 mm
1485 KgWeight1513 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Mazda 6 and 2015 Subaru Forester approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…