DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Subaru Forester vs 2013 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

68.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeMazda
ForesterModel6
2015Model year2013
CrossoverBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h8,4 s
196 km/hTop speed218 km/h
2498 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
175 HPPower170 HP
235 NmTorque226 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank64 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears6
225/60 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4595 mmLength4765 mm
1795 mmWidth1795 mm
1735 mmHeight1490 mm
1513 KgWeight1485 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2725 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Subaru Forester and 2013 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…