DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mazda 6 vs 2016 Mitsubishi Triton Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMitsubishi
6ModelTriton
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

7,8 s0–100 km/h—
223 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
192 HPPower136 HP
256 NmTorque324 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank75 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption—
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
—Tyre size245/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4870 mmLength5280 mm
1840 mmWidth1815 mm
1450 mmHeight1780 mm
1425-1529 KgWeight1820 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mazda 6 and 2016 Mitsubishi Triton approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…