DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mitsubishi Triton vs 2016 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeMazda
TritonModel6
2016Model year2016
Pick-upBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,8 s
0 km/hTop speed223 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
136 HPPower192 HP
324 NmTorque256 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank62 lt
—Urban consumption8,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,0 lt
—Average consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
245/70 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5280 mmLength4870 mm
1815 mmWidth1840 mm
1780 mmHeight1450 mm
1820 KgWeight1425-1529 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mitsubishi Triton and 2016 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…