DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Mazda 6 vs 2007 KTM X-Bow Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

KTM X-Bow

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

78.75–79.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 6SpecificationKTM X-Bow
MazdaMakeKTM
6ModelX-Bow
2006Model year2007
SedanBody typeRoadster
5Seats2
4Doors—

Performance

Mazda 6SpecificationKTM X-Bow
6,6 s0–100 km/h3,9 s
240 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
260 HPPower240 HP
380 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 6SpecificationKTM X-Bow
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank40 lt
14,0 ltUrban consumption—
8,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,2 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 6SpecificationKTM X-Bow
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/45 R18 YTyre size205/40 R17; 235/40 R18
YesABS—

Dimensions

Mazda 6SpecificationKTM X-Bow
4765 mmLength3738 mm
1780 mmWidth1915 mm
1430 mmHeight1202 mm
1590 KgWeight790 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2430 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Mazda 6 and 2007 KTM X-Bow approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, KTM X-Bow leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…