DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Volvo S60 vs 2006 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo S60SpecificationMazda 6
VolvoMakeMazda
S60Model6
2004Model year2006
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Volvo S60SpecificationMazda 6
6,8 s0–100 km/h6,6 s
250 km/hTop speed240 km/h
2319 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
250 HPPower260 HP
330 NmTorque380 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo S60SpecificationMazda 6
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,7 ltUrban consumption14,0 lt
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption8,0 lt
—Average consumption10,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo S60SpecificationMazda 6
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
215/55 R16Tyre size215/45 R18 Y
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo S60SpecificationMazda 6
4576 mmLength4765 mm
1804 mmWidth1780 mm
1428 mmHeight1430 mm
1537 KgWeight1590 Kg
2715 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Volvo S60 and 2006 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…