DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mazda 6 vs 2004 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo V50
MazdaMakeVolvo
6ModelV50
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo V50
12,3 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
189 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement2435 cc
162 HPPower170 HP
205 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo V50
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank62 lt
15,2 ltUrban consumption13,2 lt
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
10,8 ltAverage consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo V50
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/45 R17 VTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo V50
4700 mmLength4522 mm
1780 mmWidth1845 mm
1490 mmHeight1457 mm
1530 KgWeight1483 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mazda 6 and 2004 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…