DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Nissan X-Trail vs 2004 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeMazda
X-TrailModel6
2004Model year2004
SUVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
180 km/hTop speed189 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
136 HPPower162 HP
314 NmTorque205 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank62 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption15,2 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption8,2 lt
7,6 ltAverage consumption10,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears5
215/70 R15; 215/65 R16Tyre size215/45 R17 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4455 mmLength4700 mm
1765 mmWidth1780 mm
1675 mmHeight1490 mm
1525 KgWeight1530 Kg
2625 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Nissan X-Trail and 2004 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…