2004 • Mazda
6
Mazda 6 2.3 (162 Hp) 2004Overall Score60.25/100
2004 Mazda 6 vs 2004 Nissan X-Trail Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Nissan
X-Trail
Nissan X-Trail 2.2 dCi (136 Hp) 2004Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Mazda 6
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 6SpecificationNissan X-Trail
MazdaMakeNissan
6ModelX-Trail
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 6SpecificationNissan X-Trail
12,3 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
189 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
162 HPPower136 HP
205 NmTorque314 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 6SpecificationNissan X-Trail
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank60 lt
15,2 ltUrban consumption9,2 lt
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
10,8 ltAverage consumption7,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 6SpecificationNissan X-Trail
4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears6
215/45 R17 VTyre size215/70 R15; 215/65 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 6SpecificationNissan X-Trail
4700 mmLength4455 mm
1780 mmWidth1765 mm
1490 mmHeight1675 mm
1530 KgWeight1525 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2625 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Mazda 6 and 2004 Nissan X-Trail approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…