2003 • Mazda
6
Mazda 6 2.3 (162 Hp) 2003Overall Score60.25/100
2003 Mazda 6 vs 2003 Opel Omega Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.2i (144 Hp) 2003Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Mazda 6
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 6SpecificationOpel Omega
MazdaMakeOpel
6ModelOmega
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Mazda 6SpecificationOpel Omega
12,3 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
189 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
162 HPPower144 HP
205 NmTorque205 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 6SpecificationOpel Omega
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank75 lt
15,2 ltUrban consumption13,2 lt
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
10,8 ltAverage consumption9,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 6SpecificationOpel Omega
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/45 R17 VTyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 6SpecificationOpel Omega
4700 mmLength4898 mm
1780 mmWidth1776 mm
1490 mmHeight1455 mm
1530 KgWeight1535 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2730 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Mazda 6 and 2003 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…