DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Opel Omega vs 2003 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda 6
OpelMakeMazda
OmegaModel6
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda 6
10,5 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
210 km/hTop speed189 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
144 HPPower162 HP
205 NmTorque205 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda 6
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank62 lt
13,2 ltUrban consumption15,2 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption8,2 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption10,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda 6
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size215/45 R17 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Opel OmegaSpecificationMazda 6
4898 mmLength4700 mm
1776 mmWidth1780 mm
1455 mmHeight1490 mm
1535 KgWeight1530 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Opel Omega and 2003 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…