DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mazda 6 vs 2016 Nissan Navara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

75.75–75.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeNissan
6ModelNavara
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typePick Up
5Seats—
4Doors—

Performance

7,9 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
223 km/hTop speed172 km/h
2191 ccEngine displacement2298 cc
175 HPPower160 HP
420 NmTorque403 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank80 lt
5,5 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—TransmissionManual
—Tyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4870 mmLength5300 mm
1840 mmWidth1850 mm
1450 mmHeight1790 mm
1485-1590 KgWeight1993 kg
—Luggage capacity? lt
2830 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Mazda 6

No additional feature records are available.

Nissan NavaraDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlComing HomeLeaving HomeTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsAuto-dimming Rear-view MirrorLight SensorFolding MirrorsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mazda 6 and 2016 Nissan Navara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…