DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Nissan Navara vs 2016 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

75.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeMazda
NavaraModel6
2016Model year2016
Pick UpBody typeSedan
—Seats5
—Doors4

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h7,9 s
172 km/hTop speed223 km/h
2298 ccEngine displacement2191 cc
160 HPPower175 HP
403 NmTorque420 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank62 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption5,5 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
ManualTransmission—
16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5300 mmLength4870 mm
1850 mmWidth1840 mm
1790 mmHeight1450 mm
1993 kgWeight1485-1590 Kg
? ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2830 mm

Additional Features

Nissan NavaraDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlComing HomeLeaving HomeTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsAuto-dimming Rear-view MirrorLight SensorFolding MirrorsUSB PortBluetooth
Mazda 6

No additional feature records are available.

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Nissan Navara and 2016 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…