DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Mazda 6 vs 2014 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeLand Rover
6ModelFreelander
2014Model year2014
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

7,8 s0–100 km/h11,7 s
223 km/hTop speed181 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
175 HPPower150 HP
420 NmTorque420 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank68 lt
5,5 ltUrban consumption7,1 lt
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4865 mmLength4500 mm
1840 mmWidth—
1450 mmHeight1740 mm
1405 KgWeight1710 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Mazda 6 and 2014 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…