DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Land Rover Freelander vs 2014 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeMazda
FreelanderModel6
2014Model year2014
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,7 s0–100 km/h7,8 s
181 km/hTop speed223 km/h
2179 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
150 HPPower175 HP
420 NmTorque420 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank62 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption5,5 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4500 mmLength4865 mm
—Width1840 mm
1740 mmHeight1450 mm
1710 KgWeight1405 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Land Rover Freelander and 2014 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…