DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Mazda 6 vs 2013 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Ranger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 6SpecificationFord Ranger
MazdaMakeFord
6ModelRanger
2013Model year2013
EstateBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda 6SpecificationFord Ranger
9,2 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
211 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
163 HPPower166 HP
0 NmTorque226 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 6SpecificationFord Ranger
DieselFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank80 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption14,1 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption8,9 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption10,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 6SpecificationFord Ranger
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
—Tyre size255/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 6SpecificationFord Ranger
4765 mmLength5359 mm
1795 mmWidth1850 mm
1490 mmHeight1815 mm
1575 KgWeight2048 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase3220 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Mazda 6 and 2013 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…