2013 • Volvo
XC90
Volvo XC90 2.4 D4 (163 Hp) 2013Overall Score61.75/100
2013 Volvo XC90 vs 2013 Mazda 6 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Mazda
6
Mazda 6 2.2 CD (163 Hp) 2013Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Mazda 6
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
61.75–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo XC90SpecificationMazda 6
VolvoMakeMazda
XC90Model6
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Volvo XC90SpecificationMazda 6
11,8 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
0 km/hTop speed211 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
163 HPPower163 HP
340 NmTorque0 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo XC90SpecificationMazda 6
DieselFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank64 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Volvo XC90SpecificationMazda 6
4807 mmLength4765 mm
1936 mmWidth1795 mm
1784 mmHeight1490 mm
2139 KgWeight1575 Kg
2857 mmWheelbase2725 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Volvo XC90 and 2013 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableMazda 6 vs Volvo XC902013 and 2013 model years
VSImage unavailableToyota Hilux vs Volvo XC902013 and 2013 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableScion tC vs Volvo XC902013 and 2013 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableMitsubishi ASX vs Volvo XC902013 and 2013 model years
VSImage unavailableInfiniti Q50 vs Volvo XC902013 and 2013 model yearsComments are loading…