DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mazda 6 vs 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Grand Vitara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeSuzuki
6ModelGrand Vitara
2012Model year2012
EstateBody typeSUV
5Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
211 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement2393 cc
163 HPPower166 HP
0 NmTorque225 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption11,0 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
—Tyre size225/70 R16 102S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4765 mmLength4060 mm
1795 mmWidth1810 mm
1490 mmHeight1695 mm
1575 KgWeight1521 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2440 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mazda 6 and 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Grand Vitara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…