2012 • Mazda
6
Mazda 6 2.2 CD (163 Hp) 2012Overall Score62.5/100
2012 Mazda 6 vs 2012 Mazda CX-5 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Mazda
CX-5
Mazda CX-5 2.0 (160 Hp) 2012Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Mazda CX-5
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 6SpecificationMazda CX-5
MazdaMakeMazda
6ModelCX-5
2012Model year2012
EstateBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 6SpecificationMazda CX-5
9,2 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
211 km/hTop speed197 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
163 HPPower160 HP
0 NmTorque208 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 6SpecificationMazda CX-5
DieselFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank58 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption8,1 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Mazda 6SpecificationMazda CX-5
4765 mmLength4555 mm
1795 mmWidth1840 mm
1490 mmHeight1710 mm
1575 KgWeight1488 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Mazda 6 and 2012 Mazda CX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…