DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mazda 6 vs 2016 Volvo V70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–66.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo V70
MazdaMakeVolvo
6ModelV70
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo V70
9,5 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
208 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
145 HPPower136 HP
210 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo V70
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank70 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption—
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,5 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo V70
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo V70
4870 mmLength4814 mm
1840 mmWidth1907 mm
1450 mmHeight1547 mm
1375-1465 KgWeight—
2830 mmWheelbase2816 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mazda 6 and 2016 Volvo V70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…