DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volvo S80 vs 2016 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.75–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo S80SpecificationMazda 6
VolvoMakeMazda
S80Model6
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Volvo S80SpecificationMazda 6
10,4 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
205 km/hTop speed208 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
136 HPPower145 HP
350 NmTorque210 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo S80SpecificationMazda 6
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank62 lt
—Urban consumption7,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,6 lt
4,3 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo S80SpecificationMazda 6
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo S80SpecificationMazda 6
4854 mmLength4870 mm
1907 mmWidth1840 mm
1493 mmHeight1450 mm
1629 KgWeight1375-1465 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volvo S80 and 2016 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…