DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mazda 6 vs 2004 Rover 25 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 6SpecificationRover 25
MazdaMakeRover
6Model25
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

Mazda 6SpecificationRover 25
10,7 s0–100 km/h9,1 s
196 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
136 HPPower113 HP
310 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 6SpecificationRover 25
DieselFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 6SpecificationRover 25
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16 HTyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 6SpecificationRover 25
4700 mmLength3990 mm
1780 mmWidth1688 mm
1480 mmHeight1419 mm
1465 KgWeight1130 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mazda 6 and 2004 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…