2006 • Mazda
6
Mazda 6 2.0 CD (121 Hp) 2006Overall Score62.5/100
2006 Mazda 6 vs 2006 Land Rover Freelander Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Land Rover
Freelander
Land Rover Freelander 1.8 i 16V (117 Hp) 2006Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 6
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
62.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 6SpecificationLand Rover Freelander
MazdaMakeLand Rover
6ModelFreelander
2006Model year2006
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 6SpecificationLand Rover Freelander
10,9 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
190 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
121 HPPower117 HP
320 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 6SpecificationLand Rover Freelander
DieselFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption12,9 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption9,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 6SpecificationLand Rover Freelander
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
195/65 R15 HTyre size195/80 R15 S; 215/75 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 6SpecificationLand Rover Freelander
4710 mmLength4368 mm
1780 mmWidth1809 mm
1480 mmHeight1708 mm
1520 KgWeight1510 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2557 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2006 Mazda 6 and 2006 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…