DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Land Rover Freelander vs 2006 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

62.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeMazda
FreelanderModel6
2006Model year2006
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h10,9 s
160 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
117 HPPower121 HP
160 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank64 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/80 R15 S; 215/75 R15Tyre size195/65 R15 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4368 mmLength4710 mm
1809 mmWidth1780 mm
1708 mmHeight1480 mm
1510 KgWeight1520 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Land Rover Freelander and 2006 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…