E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda 6 vs 2003 BMW Z3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 6SpecificationBMW Z3
MazdaMakeBMW
6ModelZ3
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

Mazda 6SpecificationBMW Z3
11,1 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
194 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1895 cc
121 HPPower118 HP
310 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 6SpecificationBMW Z3
DieselFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank51 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption11 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 6SpecificationBMW Z3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15 HTyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 6SpecificationBMW Z3
4700 mmLength4050 mm
1780 mmWidth1740 mm
1480 mmHeight1288 mm
1465 KgWeight1220 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda 6 and 2003 BMW Z3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

2003 BMW Z3VS2003 Mazda 6BMW Z3 vs Mazda 62003 and 2003 model yearsImage unavailableVS2003 Mazda 6MG ZR vs Mazda 62003 and 2003 model yearsImage unavailableVS2003 Mazda 6MG ZS vs Mazda 62003 and 2003 model years2003 Rover 25VS2003 Mazda 6Rover 25 vs Mazda 62003 and 2003 model years2003 Rover 45VS2003 Mazda 6Rover 45 vs Mazda 62003 and 2003 model years

Comments are loading…