2003 • Mazda
6
Mazda 6 1.8 (120 Hp) 2003Overall Score54.25/100
2003 Mazda 6 vs 2003 Renault Scenic Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Renault
Scenic
Renault Scenic 1.9 dTi (98 Hp) 2003Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 6
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 6SpecificationRenault Scenic
MazdaMakeRenault
6ModelScenic
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 6SpecificationRenault Scenic
11,2 s0–100 km/h14,5 s
192 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
120 HPPower98 HP
165 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 6SpecificationRenault Scenic
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,7 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 6SpecificationRenault Scenic
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/65 R15 HTyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 6SpecificationRenault Scenic
4700 mmLength4425 mm
1780 mmWidth1775 mm
1480 mmHeight1720 mm
1335 KgWeight1485 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2620 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Mazda 6 and 2003 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…