DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mazda 6 vs 2002 Honda Sm-x Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 6SpecificationHonda Sm-x
MazdaMakeHonda
6ModelSm-x
2002Model year2002
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats4
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda 6SpecificationHonda Sm-x
11,2 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
192 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1973 cc
120 HPPower131 HP
165 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 6SpecificationHonda Sm-x
PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank65 lt
11,7 ltUrban consumption8,93 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,43 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 6SpecificationHonda Sm-x
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/65 R15 HTyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

Mazda 6SpecificationHonda Sm-x
4700 mmLength3950 mm
1780 mmWidth1695 mm
1480 mmHeight1750 mm
1335 KgWeight1330 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mazda 6 and 2002 Honda Sm-x approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…