DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Honda Sm-x vs 2002 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Honda Sm-xSpecificationMazda 6
HondaMakeMazda
Sm-xModel6
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeEstate
4Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Honda Sm-xSpecificationMazda 6
7,2 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
0 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1973 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
131 HPPower120 HP
186 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Honda Sm-xSpecificationMazda 6
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank64 lt
8,93 ltUrban consumption11,7 lt
5,43 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
—Average consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Honda Sm-xSpecificationMazda 6
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15 H
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Honda Sm-xSpecificationMazda 6
3950 mmLength4700 mm
1695 mmWidth1780 mm
1750 mmHeight1480 mm
1330 KgWeight1335 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Honda Sm-x and 2002 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…