DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Mazda 5 vs 2012 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 5SpecificationVolvo V50
MazdaMakeVolvo
5ModelV50
2014Model year2012
MinivanBody typeEstate
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 5SpecificationVolvo V50
13,1 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
186 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
144 HPPower145 HP
180 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 5SpecificationVolvo V50
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption10,2 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 5SpecificationVolvo V50
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 5SpecificationVolvo V50
4585 mmLength4522 mm
1750 mmWidth1845 mm
1615 mmHeight1457 mm
1450 KgWeight1381 Kg
2750 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Mazda 5 and 2012 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…