DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo V50 vs 2014 Mazda 5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 5
VolvoMakeMazda
V50Model5
2012Model year2014
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 5
9,6 s0–100 km/h13,1 s
0 km/hTop speed186 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
145 HPPower144 HP
185 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 5
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,2 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 5
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 5
4522 mmLength4585 mm
1845 mmWidth1750 mm
1457 mmHeight1615 mm
1381 KgWeight1450 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo V50 and 2014 Mazda 5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…