DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Mazda 323 vs 1994 Audi 80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 323SpecificationAudi 80
MazdaMakeAudi
323Model80
1994Model year1994
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda 323SpecificationAudi 80
8,5 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
213 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
144 HPPower115 HP
180 NmTorque166 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 323SpecificationAudi 80
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Urban consumption11,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 323SpecificationAudi 80
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15 VTyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 323SpecificationAudi 80
4245 mmLength4482 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1355 mmHeight1406 mm
1210 KgWeight1230 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2612 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Mazda 323 and 1994 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…