DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Audi 100 vs 1994 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 100SpecificationMazda 323
AudiMakeMazda
100Model323
1994Model year1994
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Audi 100SpecificationMazda 323
10,4 s0–100 km/h8,5 s
196 km/hTop speed213 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
137 HPPower144 HP
168 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 100SpecificationMazda 323
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,1 ltUrban consumption—
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,8 ltAverage consumption8,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 100SpecificationMazda 323
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/60 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi 100SpecificationMazda 323
4790 mmLength4245 mm
1777 mmWidth1695 mm
1440 mmHeight1355 mm
1375 KgWeight1210 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase2605 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Audi 100 and 1994 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…