DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda 323 vs 2003 Rover 25 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 323SpecificationRover 25
MazdaMakeRover
323Model25
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

Mazda 323SpecificationRover 25
9,7 s0–100 km/h9,1 s
203 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
130 HPPower113 HP
171 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 323SpecificationRover 25
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 323SpecificationRover 25
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 323SpecificationRover 25
4290 mmLength3990 mm
1705 mmWidth1688 mm
1420 mmHeight1419 mm
1185 KgWeight1130 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda 323 and 2003 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…