DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda 323 vs 2003 MG ZR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 323SpecificationMG ZR
MazdaMakeMG
323ModelZR
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

Mazda 323SpecificationMG ZR
9,7 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
203 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
130 HPPower113 HP
171 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 323SpecificationMG ZR
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 323SpecificationMG ZR
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R15Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 323SpecificationMG ZR
4290 mmLength4011 mm
1705 mmWidth1690 mm
1420 mmHeight1400 mm
1185 KgWeight1155 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2502 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda 323 and 2003 MG ZR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…