DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda 323 vs 2003 Kia Sportage Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Sportage

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeKia
323ModelSportage
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,2 s0–100 km/h14,7 s
178 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
90 HPPower128 HP
220 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption14,6 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size205/70R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4200 mmLength4315 mm
1705 mmWidth1764 mm
1410 mmHeight1650 mm
1175 KgWeight1440 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2650 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda 323 and 2003 Kia Sportage approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Sportage leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…